RESUMO
El nervio mediano desciende por el brazo y, en el codo, comienza a atravesar estructuras que pueden generar compresión, como el ligamento de Struthers, el lacertus fibrosus, el pronador redondo, el flexor superficial de los dedos. Finalmente, en la muñeca, se encuentra otro sitio de compresión producido por el ligamento transverso del carpo. Todas estas estructuras pueden provocar signos y síntomas de atrapamiento nervioso y favorecer el deterioro funcional del nervio. Nuestro objetivo es dar a conocer una actualización sobre estos sitios de atrapamiento del nervio mediano, y cómo realizar un diagnóstico preciso e indicar un trata-miento adecuado. Nivel de Evidencia: IV
The median nerve is a nervous structure that begins to cross structures at the level of the elbow that might cause compression. The Struthers ligament, lacertus fibrosus, pronator teres, and flexor digitorum superficialis are among them. Finally, the transverse carpal ligament creates another compression site in the wrist. All these structures can develop pathological signs and symptoms of nerve entrapment, which favors nerve functional degradation. Our objective is to provide an update on these median nerve entrap-ment sites, as well as information on how to establish an accurate diagnosis and provide adequate treatment. Level of Evidence: IV
Assuntos
Articulação do Punho , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Descompressão Cirúrgica , Neuropatia Mediana , Cotovelo , Nervo MedianoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to experimentally compare end-to-end and end-to-side neurorrhaphy in perineural window model after motor nerve lesion, evaluating which one was the most effective to preserve nerves. Also, differences in motor and sensorial nerve regeneration were tested to verify differences in nerve regeneration. METHODS: A total of 20 adult male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to 5 groups, and, in each one, a different treatment was performed: besides the control group, and end-to-end or end-to-side graft with motor or sensorial nerves was performed. Silastic sheet was used as a mechanical barrier to prevent innervation from adjacent nerves. After 16 weeks, the specimens were histologically assessed and wet weight was evaluated as a direct parameter of atrophy. RESULTS: The end-to-end neurorrhaphy group presented the best results in terms of mass preservation, but it did not differ significantly from the control group. Motor nerves presented similar results in muscular atrophy. The end-to-side neurorrhaphy group with sensory nerve as donor showed the worst results. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sensory nerves to preserve skeletal muscle trophism is not justified, since, according to our model, it affects 50% to 80% of the muscle mass in a period of 16 weeks. End-to-side neurorrhaphy was demonstrated to be an option for re-enervation of a nerve-deprived motor muscle in selected cases.
